Why Strategyn
Methodology
Innovative Insights
Innovation Resources
Offerings
Strategyn Institute
Conferences
Client Portfolio
Global Team
Contact Us
Innovation Resourcces
 




























This complete interview in article format is available as a pdf .
Login or Register to Download

Outcome-Driven Innovation
Home: Innovation Resources: FAQ

FAQ

1. What is innovation and what skills must a company possess in order to innovate?
2. Why is it that companies struggle to innovate?
3. What is outcome-driven innovation?
4. How does the outcome-driven innovation methodology fit into the StageGate process?
5. What types of innovation initiatives can benefit from using the outcome-driven methodology?
6. What exactly is disruptive innovation?
7. What long-held VOC myths are shattered by outcome-driven thinking?
8. How should companies work with lead users?
9. Where does TRIZ – the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving – fit into the innovation picture?
10. Why is the House of Quality (QFD) the wrong tool for the job of innovation?
11. Why should outcome-driven thinking be adopted by voice-of-the-customer (VOC) practitioners?
   
12.  Why are traditional market research techniques inadequate when it comes to innovation?

Let’s remember that innovation, at its simplest level, is a two-step process in which companies must first identify opportunities in a market, and then devise solutions that address them. In the outcome-driven paradigm, an opportunity is defined as a desired outcome or a job that is underserved – in other words, an outcome or job that is important, but not well satisfied given the products and services that are currently available.

There are three reasons why traditional market research methods make it near impossible to surface these unmet needs. First, companies typically obtain the wrong customer inputs, an incomplete set of inputs or a mix of inputs because they are unaware of what a good input is to begin with. These inputs typically include a mix of solutions, specifications, high level need statements, benefits statements, must have, exciters, latent needs and so on.

Second, because of the way questionnaires are typically structured and administered, companies often limit the number of attributes they test in a survey to about 30 when 50 to 150 statements often need to be evaluated. This means that up to 80 percent of the attributes are cut out of the survey prematurely, some of them undoubtedly important. And who is to say what gets cut out and why?

And third, companies often use scaling methods such as paired comparison and forced choice to get customers to make trade-offs between attributes – a practice that is totally inappropriate when asking customers to prioritize true customer “needs”. Making tradeoffs at this stage of the process is premature and indicates that companies are unknowingly including solutions along with need statements to evaluate in the survey.

Strategyn’s approach is unique. Our research methods ensure the right inputs are used to begin with, enable the prioritization of up to 250 customer inputs, employ the use of the optimal scaling methods and use the opportunity algorithm to determine where the greatest opportunities for value creation exist. It is methods like this that are needed to uncover hidden market opportunities.


13. What market segmentation techniques are best for the purpose of  innovation?
14. How can using outcome-driven research techniques transform market research departments into key drivers of strategy and innovation within a firm?
15. How do outcome-driven customer inputs make ideation and brainstorming methods more effective?
16. How does outcome-driven thinking support lean consumption?
17. What is the best approach for creating a culture of innovation?
18. What is the key to success in innovation?

 

 

squares