Why Strategyn
Methodology
Innovative Insights
Innovation Resources
Offerings
Strategyn Institute
Conferences
Client Portfolio
Global Team
Contact Us
Innovation Resourcces
 






























This complete interview, Addressing the Issues of Innovation,  is available as a pdf. Login or Register to Download

Outcome-Driven Innovation
Home: Innovation Resources: FAQ

FAQ

1. What is innovation and what skills must a company possess in order to innovate?
2. Why is it that companies struggle to innovate?
3. What is outcome-driven innovation?
4. How does the outcome-driven innovation methodology fit into the StageGate process?
5. What types of innovation initiatives can benefit from using the outcome-driven methodology?
6. What exactly is disruptive innovation?
7. What long-held VOC myths are shattered by outcome-driven thinking?
8. How should companies work with lead users?
9. Where does TRIZ – the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving – fit into the innovation picture?
10. Why is the House of Quality (QFD) the wrong tool for the job of innovation?
11. Why should outcome-driven thinking be adopted by voice-of-the-customer (VOC) practitioners?
12. Why are traditional market research techniques inadequate when it comes to innovation?
   
13. What market segmentation techniques are best for the purpose of innovation?

Companies use demographic, psychographic and product segmentation schemes to help execute a variety of business activities. For example, a marketing communications team may segment a market by region to help execute a mailing campaign. A finance department may use a segmentation scheme such as vertical industry to report sales figures. But when it comes to innovation, the goal of segmentation is to discover segments of customers who have different unmet needs. Finding these unique segments of opportunity – if they exist – can transform an entire industry as evidenced by companies such as e-Trade and Curves.

For the purpose of innovation, then, it makes sense to use unmet needs as the bases around which to segment the market. Many of you may be thinking – “wasn’t this the idea behind needs-based segmentation? We tried that 20 years ago and it did not work.” Well, I tried needs-based segmentation back in my days at IBM as well and I finally concluded it did not work for 2 reasons – and correcting these oversights has dramatically evolved the practice of segmentation.

First – just what a customer need is was poorly defined until recently and most needs-based segmentation studies ended up using many types of inputs for segmentation – not only needs. In order to discover segments of opportunity, a customer need must be defined as a metric that is used to measure the successful execution of a given job, and these desired outcome statements – which adhere to a strict set of rules for structure, content and format – must be used as the inputs for segmentation. Precision in the inputs is the first key to success.

Second, to find a segment of the population that has an unmet need, a company must agree on what “unmet” means. This too was not well defined until recently. An unmet need in the outcome-driven paradigm – is defined as a desired outcome that is important and not well satisfied. We have devised what we call the opportunity algorithm to mathematically calculate an opportunity score for an outcome. The more important and less satisfied an outcome is, the greater the opportunity is for value creation. Using the opportunity score as the value around which to segment a market is the second secret to a successful segmentation.

Keep in mind, we are not suggesting that a company abandon the use of other segmentation schemes – many serve a valid purpose. But when it comes to segmenting a market for the purpose of innovation, using desired outcomes as the input and the opportunity score in the clustering formula reveals what marketing organizations have wanted to discover for years – segments of customers with different unmet needs.


14. How can using outcome-driven research techniques transform market research departments into key drivers of strategy and innovation within a firm?
15. How do outcome-driven customer inputs make ideation and brainstorming methods more effective?
16. What is the best approach for creating a culture of innovation?
17. What is the key to success in innovation?

 

squares