Six Sigma, DMADV
Methodology
and Innovation
Six Sigma, a process for measuring defects and improving quality,
is comprised of two key processes: the DMAIC and DMADV methodology
steps. Where the DMAIC methodology is primarily employed to improve
upon existing business processes, the DMADV methodology is geared
towards the creation of new products and business practices. When
incorporating the DMADV methodology in an innovation effort, steps
are taken to create products that meet the customers' needs.
DMADV methodology steps are laid out in the acronym that forms its
name:
|
DMADV |
Define |
Define the
project goals and customer (internal and external)
deliverables |
| |
Measure |
Measure and
determine customer needs and specifications |
| |
Analyze |
Analyze the
process options to meet the customer needs |
| |
Design |
Design
(detailed) the process to meet the customer needs |
| |
Verify |
Verify the
design performance and ability to meet customer needs |
Like any process – its output is only as good as its input. The
DMADV process relies on a company’s ability to understand the
customers’ needs and determine which are unmet. We know, however,
that companies struggle to innovate because they do not know exactly
what the customer’s needs are, let alone which needs are unmet.
Despite all the talk about satisfying unmet customer needs, to this
day, in most companies there is no standard that defines just what
the structure, content, or format of a valid customer need statement
should be. What we find in even the most advanced companies is that
they carelessly accept all types of customer inputs for use in the
innovation process. These inputs include solutions, specifications,
wants, benefits, exciters, delighters, must haves, latent needs, and
many other types of inputs – as if any of these inputs will do –
when in fact none of them will lead to predictable innovation.
The outcome-driven innovation methodology has built upon DMADV
methodology to create a more applicable and adaptable set of tools
for applying Six Sigma thinking to the innovation process. It
defines with precision what inputs are needed and specifies the
structure, content and format they must follow in order to be solid
inputs into the innovation process. These inputs feed the innovation
process, which leads to predictable innovation.
Not surprisingly, companies using the outcome-driven innovation
methodology – an innovation process built around a DMADV foundation
– see more breakthrough solutions and fewer abandoned and failed
development efforts. They get more winning products to market, and
they do it faster and less expensively than their competitors.
Share this
|